4.2 Article

Tick-Borne Pathogens Associated with Medically Important Ticks in Alabama: A Four-Year Survey

Journal

VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 57-62

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0038

Keywords

tick(s); surveillance; microbiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 4-year survey in Alabama found tick-borne disease pathogens associated with human health. Further studies and surveillance are needed to fully understand the threat to human health in the state.
Background: Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) represent a significant threat to human health in the United States. Based on reported cases of notifiable TBDs to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) the state of Alabama is no exception, yet previously there has been no active surveillance program in place to comprehensively assess the presence and prevalence of tick vectors and their associated TBD pathogens in Alabama. Here we summarize initial findings from a 4-year survey to address this unmet need.Methods: Beginning in 2018 and proceeding through 2021, ticks were collected throughout the state of Alabama and pooled before being screened for a panel of TBD pathogens known to circulate in the United States.Results: Consistent with previously reported cases, TBD pathogens associated with anaplasmosis, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis, and spotted fever rickettsiosis were detected in ticks of Alabama. Causative agents for tularemia and Lyme disease were not detected despite previously reported human disease cases. There was also no evidence of Heartland virus despite recent reports of the virus being detected in ticks in Northwestern counties.Conclusions: While these results serve to provide some insights into TBD pathogens associated with ticks in Alabama, they also raise many questions that highlight the need for additional studies and continued surveillance to fully understand the TBD threat to human health in Alabama.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available