4.6 Article

Resistance switching characteristics of Ag/ZnO/graphene resistive random access memory

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111625

Keywords

ZnO; Random access memory; First -principles; Graphene; Biocompatibility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An Ag/ZnO/Graphene RRAM structure was prepared through RF magnetron sputtering, showing improved endurance and resistance ratio compared to devices with Au electrode and without electroforming. The density of states of ZnO supercells and their contributions to RRAM performance were calculated and analyzed. The conduction path was confirmed through I-V curve, indicating space-charge-limited conduction of electrons captured by oxygen vacancy traps. Cell toxicity test demonstrated high biocompatibility and broad applicability of Ag/ZnO/Graphene RRAM in implantable biomedical devices.
In this work, an Ag/ZnO/Graphene structure resistive random access memory (RRAM) is prepared through RF magnetron sputtering. Compared to the Ag/ZnO/Au structure device, the endurance of the device using a graphene electrode up to 3 x 103 cycles. It has a self-current compliance function of 2 x 10-4 A and 30 times switching resistance ratio and characteristics without electroforming. The density of states (DOS) of ZnO supercells with different space groups are calculated by using the first-principles, and it is analyzed that the contributions of different supercells to the conductivity and contact type of the RRAM. Combined with the I-V curve of the RRAM, it illustrated that the conduction path is created by the space-charge-limited conduction (SCLC) of electrons captured by oxygen vacancy traps. The biocompatibility of the device is tested by a cell toxicity test. It proves that the Ag/ZnO/Graphene RRAM has high biocompatibility and broad applicability in implantable biomedical devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available