4.5 Review

Vaccine hesitancy educational tools for healthcare providers and trainees: A scoping review

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 23-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.093

Keywords

Communication; Education; Healthcare Providers; Multidisciplinary; Vaccine; Vaccine Hesitancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the era of vaccine hesitancy, there is an acute need to develop an approach to reduce apprehension towards vaccinations. This study aims to provide an overview of existing educational interventions for healthcare providers on effective vaccine discussion. Several knowledge gaps were identified, including limited feasibility and generalizability of interventions, inadequate coverage of nursing and pharmacy disciplines, and the lack of interventions addressing self-monitoring and emotion management during difficult conversations. It is crucial to address these gaps and provide comprehensive educational interventions to support healthcare providers in communicating effectively with vaccine hesitant patients.
In the era of vaccine hesitancy, highlighted by the current SARS-CoV2 pandemic, there is an acute need to develop an approach to reduce and address apprehension towards vaccinations. We sought to map and present an overview of existing educational interventions for healthcare providers (HCPs) on strategies to engage in effective vaccine discussion. We applied the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework in this scoping review. We searched five relevant databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and SCOPUS) and grey literature through the Google search engine using keywords and subject headings that were systematically identified. We identified 3384 citations in peer-reviewed literature and 41 citations in grey literature. After screening for our inclusion criteria, we included 28 citations from peer reviewed literature and 16 citations from grey literature for analysis. We identified a total of 41 unique education interventions. Interventions were available from multiple disciplines, training levels, clinical settings, and diseases/vaccines. Interventions predominantly centered around two foci: knowledge sharing and com-munication training. Most interventions identified from peer-reviewed literature were facilitated and were applied with multiple modes of delivery. Interventions from grey literature were more topical and generally self-directed. We identified several gaps in knowledge. Firstly, accessibility and generaliz-ability of interventions was limited. Secondly, distribution of interventions did not adequately address nursing and pharmacy disciplines, and did not cover the breadth of medical specialties for whom vaccine discussions apply. Thirdly, no interventions addressed self monitoring and the clinicians??? recognition and management of emotions during difficult conversations. There is a need to address this gap and provide available, credible and comprehensive educational interventions that will support our healthcare provi-ders in effective communication with vaccine hesitant patients. ?? 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available