4.1 Article

The Butterfly: A Novel Minimally Invasive Transurethral Retraction Device for Benign Hypertrophy of the Prostate

Journal

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages 406-412

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000528415

Keywords

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Lower urinary tract symptoms; Bladder outlet obstruction; Minimally invasive surgical therapy; Urethral devices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and impact of the Butterfly Prostatic Retraction device on lower urinary tract symptoms. The results demonstrated the feasibility and good tolerability of the device in improving urinary flow, reducing IPSS score, and enhancing quality of life.
Introduction: The Butterfly Prostatic Retraction device is a novel transurethral implant designed to dilate the prostatic urethra and treat lower urinary tract symptoms. We assessed its safety, efficacy and impact on urinary flow, ejaculation, and quality of life. Materials and Methods: We included 64 men, treated for benign prostate hyperplasia for at least 1 year. All patients had Qmax <= 13 mL/s and IPSS >12. Insertion of the device was performed via cystoscopy. Follow-up visits were performed at 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and included uroflowmetry, IPSS, QoL, and sexual function questionnaires. Cystoscopy was performed on 3 and 12 months. Results: Patients age was 50-83 years. 28 patients completed a 1-year follow-up with an intact device. Mean Qmax improved by 2 mL/s (25%), IPSS median drop was 10 points (40%), and QoL score was 1.5 points (38%). Sexually active patients reported antegrade ejaculation. On cystoscopy, gradual coverage of the devices with urethral mucosa was observed. In 1 patient, the device was repositioned. In 19 patients, the device was removed. 12 patients returned to alpha-blocker therapy and 7 patients underwent TURP. One patient developed a bulbar urethral stricture. Conclusions: We demonstrated feasibility and good tolerability of the Butterfly device.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available