4.5 Article

BEDSIDE CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW QUANTIFICATION IN NEONATES

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 2468-2475

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.07.010

Keywords

Volume flow; Color flow; Partial volume; Real time; Ultrasound; Biomarker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of blood flow to the brain in neonates is valuable but challenging in clinical settings. Researchers have developed an ultrasound blood volume flow technique that can safely and conveniently assess cerebral blood flow in newborns, offering potential for monitoring and evaluating blood flow in various clinical conditions.
Measurement of blood flow to the brain in neonates would be a very valuable addition to the medical diagnostic armamentarium. Such conditions such as assessment of closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) would greatly benefit from such an evaluation. However, measurement of cerebral blood flow in a clinical setting has proven very difficult and, as such, is rarely employed. Present techniques are often cumbersome, difficult to perform and potentially dangerous for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. We have been developing an ultra-sound blood volume flow technique that could be routinely used to assess blood flow to the brain in neonates. By scanning through the anterior fontanelles of 10 normal, full-term newborn infants, we were able to estimate total brain blood flows that closely match those published in the literature using much more invasive and technically demanding methods. Our method is safe, easy to do, does not require contrast agents and can be performed in the baby's incubator. The method has the potential for monitoring and assessing blood flows to the brain and could be used to routinely assess cerebral blood flow in many different clinical conditions. (E-mail: oliver. kripfgans@umich.edu) (c) 2022 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available