4.6 Article

Genuine quantum coherence

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/50/4/045301

Keywords

quantum coherence; resource theories; incoherent transformations and state manipulation

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation
  2. Spanish MINECO [MTM2014-54692-P, MTM2014-54240-P]
  3. Comunidad de Madrid [QUITEMAD + CM S2013/ICE-2801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Any quantum resource theory is based on free states and free operations, i. e. states and operations which can be created and performed at no cost. In the resource theory of coherence free states are diagonal in some fixed basis, and free operations are those which cannot create coherence for some particular experimental realization. Recently, some problems of this approach have been discussed, and new sets of operations have been proposed to resolve these problems. We propose here the framework of genuine quantum coherence. This approach is based on a simple principle: we demand that a genuinely incoherent operation preserves all incoherent states. This framework captures coherence under additional constrains such as energy preservation and all genuinely incoherent operations are incoherent regardless of their particular experimental realization. We also introduce the full class of operations with this property, which we call fully incoherent. We analyze in detail the mathematical structure of these classes and also study possible state transformations. We show that deterministic manipulation is severely limited, even in the asymptotic settings. In particular, this framework does not have a unique golden unit, i. e. there is no single state from which all other states can be created deterministically with the free operations. This suggests that any reasonably powerful resource theory of coherence must contain free operations which can potentially create coherence in some experimental realization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available