4.7 Article

Determination of occurrence and leaching toxicity of arsenic in copper flash smelting slags

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(22)66107-7

Keywords

copper flash smelting; arsenic; copper slag; selective sequential extraction; leaching toxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accurate understanding of arsenic (As) species distribution and their leaching toxicity in copper smelting slag is crucial for its efficient and safe disposition. Various analytical techniques were employed to investigate the As species in the slag and evaluate their potential toxicity. The results revealed that As existed in various forms in the slag, including water-soluble As, Cu-As intermetallics, Cu-As sulfides, as well as As incorporated in fayalite and glassy silicates. Flotation of readily soluble As and Cu-As intermetallics was effective in reducing the leaching toxicity of slag tailings and meeting the regulatory thresholds for As set by USEPA and SEPA.
The efficient and safe disposition of arsenic (As)-containing copper slag depends on the accurate understanding of the As species and their corresponding leaching toxicity. The As species in copper smelting slag were investigated by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, X-ray diffractometry, electron probe microanalyzer, scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and selectively sequential extraction scheme. Based on the accurate fractionation of As species, the potential source of As toxicity of copper slag was investigated. The results show that As can be associated with smelting slag in the forms of water-soluble As, Cu-As intermetallics, Cu-As sulfides, as well as the As incorporated in fayalite and glassy silicates. The removal of readily soluble As and Cu-As intermetallics from smelting slag by flotation can reduce the As leaching toxicity of slag tailings, making them conform to the USEPA and SEPA regulatory thresholds for As.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available