4.7 Article

In vitro study of ochratoxin A in the expression of genes associated with neuron survival and viability

Journal

TOXICOLOGY
Volume 483, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153376

Keywords

Mycotoxin; Ochratoxin A; SH-SY5Y; Neuron; BDNF; Survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of Ochratoxin A (OTA) on neuronal survival and viability. The findings suggest that typical daily exposure to OTA may not trigger neuronal dysfunction, but increased OTA dose caused decreased BDNF expression, potentially leading to adverse effects on neuronal health.
Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a common mycotoxin and known contaminant of crops, foods and drinks. As OTA crosses the blood-brain barrier, this study investigated the role of OTA, as an environmental hazard, on neuronal survival and viability. The impact of a range of OTA concentrations on the expression of MAPT, BAX, P53, BDNF and TPPP genes was investigated using human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells. The absence of altered gene expression determined using reverse transcription quantitative PCR demonstrated that exposure to a typical daily dose of OTA delivered to the brain (2 fM), may not trigger neuronal dysfunction. However, a dose of OTA (2 pM) decreased BDNF expression. BDNF and TPPP expression were significantly reduced after 1 day and significantly increased after 2 days of exposure to 1 mu M OTA. The expression of P53, MAPT, and BAX was reduced at both days. Thus, despite OTA cytotoxicity, SH-SY5Y cells entered a survival state following a strong toxic insult. A typical daily environmental OTA exposure does not appear to carry an increased risk of neurodegenerative disease. However, BDNF dysfunction may occur through prolonged exposure to a dose one thousand times higher than the typical daily consumed OTA dose potentially causing adverse effects on neuronal health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available