4.5 Article

Impact of FDA endorsement and modified risk versus exposure messaging in IQOS ads: a randomised factorial experiment among US and Israeli adults

Journal

TOBACCO CONTROL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057639

Keywords

advertising and promotion; harm reduction; media; packaging and labelling; non-cigarette tobacco products

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research found that compared to control messaging, exposure to control messaging would result in higher perceived relative harm, exposure, and disease risk, as well as reduced likelihood of suggesting IQOS to smokers. On the other hand, reduced risk messaging could lower perceived relative harm of IQOS. Additionally, specific FDA endorsement messages may increase the likelihood of recommending IQOS to smokers.
BackgroundIQOS was the first heated tobacco product to receive Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorisation for 'reduced exposure' marketing claims, which has been exploited globally. MethodsIn November-December 2021, we conducted a survey-based 3x3 factorial experiment among US (n=1128) and Israeli adults (n=1094). We presented: (1) reduced exposure, reduced risk and control messaging and (2) 2 variations of FDA endorsement and control messaging. Each participant was randomly assigned to evaluate 2 ads (displayed on different ad imagery), then completed assessments of perceived relative harm, exposure and disease risk and likelihood of personally trying or suggesting IQOS to smokers. Ordinal logistic regression examined messaging conditions and their interactions, on the 5 outcomes, respectively, adjusting for covariates. ResultsControl (vs reduced exposure) messaging resulted in higher perceived relative harm (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.29, 95% CI=1.12 to 1.48), exposure (aOR=1.34, 95% CI=1.17 to 1.54) and disease risk (aOR=1.23; 95% CI=1.08 to 1.40), and lower likelihood of suggesting IQOS to smokers (aOR=0.85; 95% CI=0.74 to 0.97). Reduced risk (vs exposure) messaging resulted in lower perceived relative harm (aOR=0.86; 95% CI=0.75 to 0.99). One FDA endorsement message ('IQOS (completed) the US FDA examination of tobacco products. FDA concluded that IQOS is a better choice for adult smokers') was associated with greater likelihood of suggesting IQOS to smokers, relative to control (aOR=1.19; 95% CI=1.04 to 1.37). No interactions between risk/exposure messaging and FDA endorsement messaging were found. Additionally, Israeli participants, cigarette users and men perceived lower relative harm and exposure and greater likelihood of trying or suggesting IQOS to smokers. ConclusionsRegulators must monitor direct and indirect advertising content of modified risk tobacco product-authorised products and prevent potentially harmful misinterpretations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available