4.6 Article

Longitudinal In Vivo Monitoring of Atheroprogression in Hypercholesterolemic Mice Using Photoacoustic Imaging

Journal

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages 545-554

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2005-8784

Keywords

atherosclerosis; inflammation; photoacoustic imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to establish a protocol for longitudinal monitoring of plaque composition in atherosclerosis, including lipid, collagen, macrophage burden, and endothelial permeability. The protocol was validated by correlating photoacoustic signals with histomorphometric and immunofluorescence analyses in albino Apoe(-/-) mice. The study demonstrates an innovative and non-invasive approach to assess arterial inflammation in mice.
Background and Aim The ability to recognize and monitor atherosclerotic lesion development using non-invasive imaging is crucial in preventive cardiology. The aim of the present study was to establish a protocol for longitudinal monitoring of plaque lipid, collagen, and macrophage burden as well as of endothelial permeability.Methods and Results Photoacoustic signals derived from endogenous or exogenous dyes assessed in vivo, in plaques of albino Apoe(-/-)mice, correlated with lesion characteristics obtained after histomorphometric and immunofluorescence analyses, thus supporting the validity of our protocol. Using models of atheroprogression and regression, we could apply our imaging protocol to the longitudinal observation of atherosclerotic lesion characteristics in mice.Conclusions The present study shows an innovative approach to assess arterial inflammation in a non-invasive fashion, applicable to longitudinal analyses of changes of atherosclerotic lesion composition. Such approach could prove important in the preclinical testing of therapeutic interventions in mice carrying pre-established lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available