Let me choose what I want: The influence of incentive choice flexibility on the quality of crowdsourcing solutions to innovation problems

Organizations increasingly engage in crowdsourcing to find solutions to their innovation problems, but many of these solutions are of low quality. This could be because organizations do not really know what motivates each individual participant to engage in crowdsourcing, and thus offer the same incentives to all. As a 'one-size-fits-all' incentive structure is not optimal due to divergent participant motives, in this paper, we aim to empirically investigate how providing participants with incentive choice flexibility impacts solution quality. Based on a between-subject field experiment, we find that participants who have an opportunity to choose their preferred incentive spend much more time developing their solutions and come up with higher quality solutions than those who are offered a single incentive option. Our study contributes to the literature by highlighting the importance of adopting a flexible incentive structure to improve the quality of the crowdsourced solutions, and by suggesting that an exclusive focus on how a single incentive type (either non-monetary or monetary) impacts solution quality is unsuitable for estimating such impact correctly.

Automated summary

Organizations often face low-quality solutions in crowdsourcing due to a lack of understanding of participant motivations. This paper examines the impact of incentive choice flexibility on solution quality through a field experiment. The findings suggest that participants who can choose their preferred incentive spend more time and produce higher quality solutions compared to those with a single incentive option. This study highlights the importance of adopting a flexible incentive structure and challenges the focus on a single type of incentive in estimating its impact on solution quality.