Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography for the depth of gastric cancer suspected of submucosal invasion: a multicenter prospective study

Background Although the combination of conventional endoscopy (CE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is useful for predicting the depth of early gastric cancer (EGC), the diagnostic value of EUS for submucosal (SM) invasive cancer has not been fully investigated. Methods We conducted a multicenter prospective study from May 2017 to January 2021 to evaluate the validity of a diagnostic strategy combining CE and EUS and to clarify the additional value of EUS for EGC suspected of SM invasion. In each case, the diagnosis was first made using CE, followed by EUS, and finally confirmed using a combination algorithm. Results A total of 180 patients with EGC were enrolled from 10 institutions, of which 175 were analyzed. The histopathological depths were M, SM1, SM2, and & GE; MP in 72, 16, 64, and 23 lesions, respectively. Treatment included 92 endoscopic submucosal dissection cases and 83 surgical cases. The overall diagnostic accuracy classified by M-SM1 or SM2-MP was 58.3% for CE, 75.7% for EUS, and 78.9% for the combination of CE and EUS; the latter two were significantly higher than that of CE alone (P < 0.001). The CE, EUS, and combination accuracy rates in 108 differentiated-type lesions were 51.9%, 77.4%, and 79.6%, respectively; the latter two were significantly higher than CE alone (P < 0.001). A significant additive effect of EUS was observed in CE-SM2 low-confidence lesions but not in CE-M-SM1 lesions or in CE-SM2 high-confidence lesions. Among the nine CE findings, irregular surface, submucosal tumor-like elevation, and non-extension signs were significant independent markers of pSM2-MP. Poorly delineated EUS lesions were misdiagnosed. Conclusions EUS provides additional value for differentiated-type and CE-SM2 low-confidence EGCs in diagnosing invasion depth.

Automated summary

The study evaluates the validity of a diagnostic strategy combining conventional endoscopy (CE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and determines the additional value of EUS for EGC suspected of submucosal (SM) invasion. The results show that the combination of CE and EUS has a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to CE alone, particularly in differentiating lesion types and low-confidence CE-SM2 lesions.