4.3 Article

The influence of serum cholinesterase levels and sarcopenia on postoperative infectious complications in colorectal cancer surgery

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 53, Issue 7, Pages 816-823

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02625-1

Keywords

Cholinesterase; Colorectal cancer; Infectious complication; Interaction; Sarcopenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found a relationship between preoperative serum cholinesterase levels and postoperative infectious complications in colorectal cancer surgery. The association differs by the sarcopenia status, suggesting a potential interaction between nutritional markers and sarcopenia.
Purpose Cholinesterase is a nutritional marker associated with sarcopenia. The present study evaluated the relationship between cholinesterase and postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. Methods The study involved 231 patients who had undergone colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between preoperative serum cholinesterase levels and postoperative infectious complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for postoperative infectious complications. We then performed stratified analyses to assess the interaction between cholinesterase and clinical variables to predict postoperative infectious complications. Results In the multivariate analysis, the body mass index (P = 0.010), serum cholinesterase levels (P = 0.005), sarcopenia (P = 0.003) and blood loss (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative infectious complications. In stratified analyses, the association between serum cholinesterase levels and postoperative infectious complications differed by the sarcopenia status (P-interaction = 0.006). Conclusion Preoperative serum cholinesterase levels may be useful for predicting postoperative infectious complications in colorectal cancer surgery. The association differs by the sarcopenia status, suggesting a potential interaction between nutritional markers and sarcopenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available