4.6 Article

Hobson's choice or a horned dilemma: a grounded theory on adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy verified with breast cancer survivors

Journal

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 10127-10136

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07435-2

Keywords

Grounded theory; Adherence; Medication; Breast cancer; Hormone therapy; Qualitative research

Funding

  1. Shaqra University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a grounded theory based on a literature review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research to explain the difficulties faced by breast cancer survivors in making the initial decision to accept long-term endocrine therapy and the challenges of continuing or stopping treatment. The findings indicated that some women changed their minds about treatment due to medication side effects over time.
Purpose A literature review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research had enabled us to develop a grounded theory explaining the difficulties breast cancer survivors face with the initial decision to accept long-term endocrine therapy, and the everyday challenges of continuing or deciding to stop treatment early. Our objective was to interview a cohort of women in a UK setting to corroborate and complete the grounded theory with the end users' primary involvement. Methods A semi-structured interview schedule was written based on the existing grounded theory. Fourteen women with a history of hormone-positive breast cancer were recruited and interviewed. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and analysed against the existing grounded theory. Results The findings were compatible with the core theory 'Hobson's choice or a horned dilemma' and its constituent categories previously developed, with additional concepts identified and added to our paradigm models. Importantly, we found that some women who started with a strong sense of commitment to their treatment changed their mind as they experienced the medication side effects over time, impacting on their persistence with long-term endocrine therapy. Conclusion The findings indicate an opportunity for health providers to intervene and influence women's waning perceptions of the necessity of their treatment, for example upon experiencing the side effects. Interventions could involve the provision of side effect management strategies via accessible resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available