4.6 Article

Multiscale stochastic volatility for variance swaps with constant elasticity of variance

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 4879-4890

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07679-4

Keywords

Multiscale; Stochastic volatility; Constant elasticity of variance; Variance swap; Monte Carlo simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The variance swap is a popular volatility derivative used for risk management of financial instruments. We propose a hybrid model for evaluating the fair strike prices, and validate the theoretical formula through Monte Carlo simulation.
The variance swap is one of volatility derivatives popularly used for the risk management of financial instruments traded in volatile market. An appropriate choice of a volatility model is an important part of the risk management. One of desirable considerations should be given to the fact that the volatility varies on several characteristic time scales. Stochastic volatility models can reflect this feature by introducing multiscale volatility factors. However, pure stochastic volatility models cannot capture the whole volatility surface accurately although the model parameters have been calibrated to replicate the market implied volatility data for near at-the-money strikes. So, we choose a hybrid model of constant elasticity of variance type of local volatility and fast and slow scale stochastic volatility for evaluating the fair strikes of variance swaps. We obtain a closed-form solution formula for the approximate fair strike values of continuously sampled variance swaps and compute the solution. The theoretical formula is validated through Monte Carlo simulation. The predictability of the strike price movements is discussed in terms of the sensitive effects of the stochastic volatility and the elasticity of variance parameters for a given partial information about the underlying asset and volatility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available