3.8 Article

The effect of an active vibration stimulus according to different shoulder joint angles on functional reach and stability of the shoulder joint

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 747-751

Publisher

SOC PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.747

Keywords

Active vibration stimulus; Flexi-Bar; Shoulder joint angle

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of an active vibration stimulus exercise according to shoulder joint angles on functional reach and stability of the shoulder joint. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty healthy male students participated in this study. Upper limb length of each subject was measured to obtain normalized measurement values. The exercise groups were as follows: group I (n=10, shoulder joint angle of 90 degrees), group II (n=10, shoulder joint angle of 130 degrees), and group III (n=10, shoulder joint angle of 180 degrees). After warm-up, an active vibration stimulus was applied to the subjects with a Flexi-Bar. The Functional Reach Test and Y-balance test were conducted for measurement of shoulder stability. [Results] Analysis of covariance was conducted with values before the intervention as covariates to analyze the differences among the groups in the two tests. There were significant differences among the groups. According to Bonferroni post hoc comparison, group I showed greater improvement than group III in the Functional Reach Test, and group II showed greater improvement than group I and group III in the Y-balance test. [Conclusion] The effect of the exercise with different shoulder joint angles revealed that the shoulder joint has a certain effective joint angle for its functionality and stability. In addition, application of an active vibration stimulus with a Flexi-Bar can be a very effective tool for improvement of functionality and stability of the shoulder joint.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available