4.4 Review

The association between social class and the impact of treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Journal

SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 581-603

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02378-9

Keywords

Systematic review; Social; Mobility; Intervention; Socio-economic status

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review aimed to examine the association between social class and the effectiveness of interventions for mental health disorders. The findings suggest that individuals from lower social class may have reduced access to mental health care and may not benefit from all interventions, with reduced effectiveness. However, psychosocial interventions could potentially improve employment rates.
Purpose This systematic review aimed to synthesise all quantitative literature on the association between social class and the effectiveness of interventions for mental health disorders. Methods Systematic literature searches (inception-March 2021) were conducted across 7 databases, and all quantitative studies meeting inclusion criteria, examining the impact of social class on access to treatment, or intervention effectiveness, or the impact of treatment on social mobility, were synthesised narratively. Results Evidence suggests that lower social class may be associated with reduced access to primary and secondary mental health care and increased likelihood of access via crisis services, and patients of lower social class may not benefit from all mental health interventions, with reduced effectiveness. While limited, there was some indication that psychosocial interventions could encourage increased employment rates. Conclusion Social class is associated with the effectiveness of psychological interventions, and should be considered when designing new interventions to prevent barriers to access and improve effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available