4.6 Article

Modeling and simulation for designing a line walking chameleon-like legged robot

Journal

SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102648

Keywords

Biologically-inspired robots; Legged robot; Body balancing; Motion control; Simulation and modeling

Funding

  1. Universidad Panamericana [UP-CI-2018-ING-MX-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents the design of a line walking legged robot for narrow support. Inspired by the locomotion of chameleons, the robot achieves self-balancing and straight line walking. The experimental results demonstrate that the robot can walk smoothly on narrow support lines, which is significant for rescue and maintenance missions.
Legged robots have been developed to move on uneven terrains. They can move smoother and step over obstacles easily, and they are more versatile in various environmental scenarios. These features make them desirable for maintenance and/or search-and-rescue tasks where mobility is restricted on these complex terrains. A problem arises when legged robots are required to walk on the top of narrow support, e.g. thin beams or tubes. In this work, we present the design of a line walking legged robot for narrowed support. To achieve this goal, we get inspiration from the chameleon locomotion. From these observations, we simulate the robot, design an intelligent control strategy for self-balancing and walking, and we implement a robot prototype. The experimental results show that the balance controller provides a tilt angle of 2.24 +/- 2.21?, while the robot walks in a straight line with a maximum offset of 3.0 cm and with a walking velocity of 0.2 cm/s. Our results demonstrate that the robot can move on narrowed support lines. We anticipate that the design of legged robots inspired by the chameleon locomotion might open wider possibilities for rescue and maintenance missions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available