Journal
SHOCK
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 360-367Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002067
Keywords
Hypotension; lactate; outcomes; sepsis; CI-confidence interval; CRRT-continuous renal replacement therapy; ED-emergency department; ICU-intensive care unit; LOS-length of stay; MAP-mean arterial pressure; MDR--multidrug resistance; MV-mechanical ventilation; SAPS-Simplified Acute Physiology Score; SIRS-systemic inflammatory response syndrome; SOFA-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the significance of hypotension at sepsis recognition in sepsis patients with normal lactate levels. The results showed that neither hypotension nor vasopressor use adversely affected the hospital outcome in sepsis patients with normal lactate levels. The study emphasizes the importance of early interventions and appropriate use of antibiotics regardless of whether a patient is or is not hypotensive.
Background and Objective: Although sepsis is heterogeneous, data on sepsis patients with normal lactate levels are very limited. We explored whether hypotension at the time of sepsis recognition (i.e., time zero) was significant in terms of survival when lactate levels were normal in sepsis patients. Patients and Design: This was a prospective multicenter observational study conducted in 19 hospitals (20 intensive care units [ICUs]). Adult sepsis patients with normal lactate levels (<= 2 mmol/L) admitted to ICUs were divided by the mean arterial pressure at time zero into hypotensive (<65 mm Hg) and nonhypotensive groups (>= 65 mm Hg). Measurements and Results: Of 2,032 patients with sepsis (not septic shock), 617 with normal lactate levels were included in the analysis. The hypotensive group (n = 237) was characterized by higher rates of abdominal or urinary infections, and bacteremia, whereas the nonhypotensive group (n = 380) was characterized by higher rates of pulmonary infections and systemic inflammatory response. However, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (excluding the cardiovascular score) were not different between the groups. During sepsis resuscitation, the rates of antibiotic administration within 1, 3, and 6 h of time zero were higher in the hypotensive than nonhypotensive group (P < 0.05 for all time points), and the amounts of pre-ICU fluids given were also higher in the hypotensive group. However, despite a higher rate of vasopressor use in the hypotensive group, ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were not different between the groups (12.7% vs. 13.9% [P = 0.648] and 19.4% vs. 22.4% [P = 0.382], respectively). In multivariable analysis, the use of appropriate antibiotics and early lactate measurement were significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: In sepsis patients with normal lactate levels, neither hypotension nor vasopressor use adversely impacted the hospital outcome. Our results emphasize the importance of early interventions and appropriate use of antibiotics regardless of whether a patient is or is not hypotensive.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available