4.6 Article

A Wi-Fi-Based Passive Indoor Positioning System via Entropy-Enhanced Deployment of Wi-Fi Sniffers

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23031376

Keywords

Internet of Things; Wi-Fi-based passive indoor positioning system; Wi-Fi Sniffer; received signal strength indicator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a passive indoor positioning system (IPS) that uses Wi-Fi fingerprints collected by Wi-Fi Sniffers to estimate the position of a device-under-test (DUT). A modified Genetic Algorithm (GA) is proposed to optimize the Wi-Fi Sniffers' deployment. The preliminary results show an offline positioning accuracy of 2.2 m using 20 Wi-Fi Sniffers.
This study presents a Wi-Fi-based passive indoor positioning system (IPS) that does not require active collaboration from the user or additional interfaces on the device-under-test (DUT). To maximise the accuracy of the IPS, the optimal deployment of Wi-Fi Sniffers in the area of interest is crucial. A modified Genetic Algorithm (GA) with an entropy-enhanced objective function is proposed to optimize the deployment. These Wi-Fi Sniffers are used to scan and collect the DUT's Wi-Fi received signal strength indicators (RSSIs) as Wi-Fi fingerprints, which are then mapped to reference points (RPs) in the physical world. The positioning algorithm utilises a weighted k-nearest neighbourhood (WKNN) method. Automated data collection of RSSI on each RP is achieved using a surveying robot for the Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. The preliminary results show that using only 20 Wi-Fi Sniffers as features for model training, the offline positioning accuracy is 2.2 m in terms of root mean squared error (RMSE). A proof-of-concept real-time online passive IPS is implemented to show that it is possible to detect the online presence of DUTs and obtain their RSSIs as online fingerprints to estimate their position.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available