4.6 Article

Uniformity Correction of CMOS Image Sensor Modules for Machine Vision Cameras

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22249733

Keywords

CMOS; image sensor; ISP; FPGA; ASIC; NUC; FFC; FPN; DSNU; PRNU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the nonuniformity issues of two CMOS image sensors for machine vision applications and proposes an optimized hardware architecture to compensate for the nonuniformities. It also discusses performance configurations for different application areas and compares different nonuniformity correction approaches.
Flat-field correction (FFC) is commonly used in image signal processing (ISP) to improve the uniformity of image sensor pixels. Image sensor nonuniformity and lens system characteristics have been known to be temperature-dependent. Some machine vision applications, such as visual odometry and single-pixel airborne object tracking, are extremely sensitive to pixel-to-pixel sensitivity variations. Numerous cameras, especially in the fields of infrared imaging and staring cameras, use multiple calibration images to correct for nonuniformities. This paper characterizes the temperature and analog gain dependence of the dark signal nonuniformity (DSNU) and photoresponse nonuniformity (PRNU) of two contemporary global shutter CMOS image sensors for machine vision applications. An optimized hardware architecture is proposed to compensate for nonuniformities, with optional parametric lens shading correction (LSC). Three different performance configurations are outlined for different application areas, costs, and power requirements. For most commercial applications, the correction of LSC suffices. For both DSNU and PRNU, compensation with one or multiple calibration images, captured at different gain and temperature settings are considered. For more demanding applications, the effectiveness, external memory bandwidth, power consumption, implementation, and calibration complexity, as well as the camera manufacturability of different nonuniformity correction approaches were compared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available