4.6 Review

Neural Architecture Search Survey: A Computer Vision Perspective

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23031713

Keywords

artificial intelligence (AI); deep learning (DL); convolutional neural network (CNN); automated machine learning (Auto-ML); neural architecture search (NAS); computer vision (CV)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, deep learning has been extensively researched globally, particularly in training methods and network structures, and has proven highly effective in various tasks and applications. This paper summarizes the basic concepts of automated neural architecture search (NAS) and provides an overview of recent studies on its applications.
In recent years, deep learning (DL) has been widely studied using various methods across the globe, especially with respect to training methods and network structures, proving highly effective in a wide range of tasks and applications, including image, speech, and text recognition. One important aspect of this advancement is involved in the effort of designing and upgrading neural architectures, which has been consistently attempted thus far. However, designing such architectures requires the combined knowledge and know-how of experts from each relevant discipline and a series of trial-and-error steps. In this light, automated neural architecture search (NAS) methods are increasingly at the center of attention; this paper aimed at summarizing the basic concepts of NAS while providing an overview of recent studies on the applications of NAS. It is worth noting that most previous survey studies on NAS have been focused on perspectives of hardware or search strategies. To the best knowledge of the present authors, this study is the first to look at NAS from a computer vision perspective. In the present study, computer vision areas were categorized by task, and recent trends found in each study on NAS were analyzed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available