4.6 Article

High Spectral Sensitivity of Strongly Coupled Hybrid Tamm-Plasmonic Resonances for Biosensing Application

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22239453

Keywords

hybrid lattice plasmonic resonance; strong coupling; Tamm plasmons

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the sensitivity to refractive index changes of different structures was compared, showing that the hybrid plasmonic mode, due to strong coupling effect, has higher sensitivity to refractive index changes than traditional surface plasmon resonance.
In this study, the sensitivity to the refractive index changes of the ambient was studied on the uniform gold film (similar to 50 nm) with a 1D photonic crystal (PC) from periodic five TiO2 (similar to 110 nm)/SiO2 (similar to 200 nm) bilayers and gold nano-bumps array produced by direct laser writing on the same sample. The optical signal sensitivity of hybrid plasmonic resonances was compared with traditional surface plasmon resonance (SPR) on a single gold layer. The influence of the strong coupling regime between Tamm plasmon polariton (TPP) and propagated plasmon polaritons in the hybrid plasmonic modes on the sensitivity of the optical was discussed. Recent studies have shown very high hybrid plasmonic mode sensitivity S-HSPP approximate to 26,000 nm/RIU to the refractive index on the uniform gold layer; meanwhile, the introduction of gold lattice reduces the signal sensitivity, but increases the Q-factor of the plasmonic resonances. Despite this, the sensitivity to the ellipsometric parameters psi and Delta on the gold lattice was rather high due to the increased Q-factor of the resonances. The comparison of plasmonic resonance sensitivity to the refractive index changes of hybrid TPP-SPP mode on the uniform gold layer and traditional SPR have shown that hybrid plasmonic mode, due to a strong coupling effect, overcomes the SPR by about 27%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available