4.6 Article

Development of a New Voltammetric Method for Aceclofenac Determination on Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Hierarchical Nanocomposite

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22228954

Keywords

aceclofenac; metal nanoparticles; voltammetry; carbon nanomaterials

Funding

  1. program Excellence initiative-research university for the AGH University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new voltammetric method for the determination of ACL in pharmaceutics, urine, and plasma. The modified electrode used in this method exhibits good repeatability and sensitivity, and its preparation process is simple, fast, and cost-effective. The method is validated through calibration and recovery analysis, demonstrating its accuracy and applicability in routine laboratory practice.
Aceclofenac (ACL) is an anti-inflammatory drug, which is taken by patients who mainly suffer from rheumatoid conditions. In this work, we propose a new voltammetric method that allows the determination of ACL in pharmaceutics, urine, and plasma. As a working electrode, a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified with carbon nanofibers, carbon nanotubes, and NiCo nanoparticles (eCNF/CNT/NiCo-GCE) was used. The mentioned sensors are characterized by good repeatability and sensitivity, and their process of preparation is simple, fast, and cost-effective. Instrumental and method parameters were optimized, and the influence of interferences was investigated. To validate the analytical performance of the method, calibration was conducted. Good linearity was obtained (0.05-1.4 mu M, r = 0.998), as well as excellent limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values (0.7 nM and 2.1 nM, respectively). Calculated recoveries that were in the range of 98%-105% indicate that this method is accurate and might be used in routine laboratory practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available