4.7 Article

Evaluating deep-sea communities' susceptibility to mining plumes using shallow-water data

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 852, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158162

Keywords

Suspended sediment; Thresholds

Funding

  1. Benioff Ocean Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that animal responses to increased suspended sediment concentrations are generally negative and similar across different aquatic habitats. Further research is needed to understand the specific impacts of increased sediment concentrations in deep-sea environments.
Increased suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) are a major stressor across aquatic habitats. Here, the literature was synthesized to show that animal responses to increases in relative SSC (test concentration/natural background concentration) were similar in type and negative across different shallow-water (marine, estuarine, freshwater) habi-tats. Further, animal sensitivities are similar across habitats based on relative SSC and occur starting at low relative SSC increases in all habitats despite differences in natural background SSC. Based upon these similarities in relative SSC sensitivities, deep-sea sensitivity values for acute exposure to increased SSC, where empirical data are almost non-existent, were estimated. Because of the low natural SSC in deep sea environments, very small increases in absolute SSC could result in acute effects. How the methods and results can be used to inform regulatory thresholds are dis-cussed. Because of the large variability in shallow water datasets and differences between deep-sea and shallow -water habitats, deep-sea specific data are needed to verify the estimates and improve their precision. Following the precautionary principle and the results presented here, it is recommended that the threshold for acute plume impacts is set very close to natural background levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available