4.8 Article

A new biologic paleoaltimetry indicating Late Miocene rapid uplift of northern Tibet Plateau

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 378, Issue 6624, Pages 1074-1078

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abo2475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition program [2019QZKK0707]
  2. NSFC [41888101, 41988101, 41772181, 42122028, 42202029]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDA20070202]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2022YFF0801501]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists [2021FSE0001]
  6. Leverhulme grants [RPG-2019-365, RPG-2021-202]
  7. NERC [NE/X015505/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses pollen records to investigate the uplift of the northern Tibet Plateau during the Late Miocene. The results suggest that the entire plateau may have reached a high elevation similar to today, with significant impacts on atmospheric precipitation and alpine biodiversity.
The uplift of the Tibet Plateau (TP) during the Miocene is crucial to understanding the evolution of Asian monsoon regimes and alpine biodiversity. However, the northern Tibet Plateau (NTP) remains poorly investigated. We use pollen records of montane conifers (Tsuga, Podocarpus, Abies, and Picea) as a new paleoaltimetry to construct two parallel midrange paleoelevation sequences in the NTP at 1332 +/- 189 m and 433 +/- 189 m, respectively, during the Middle Miocene [similar to 15 million years ago (Ma)]. Both midranges increased rapidly to 3685 +/- 87 m in the Late Miocene (similar to 11 Ma) in the east, and to 3589 +/- 62 m at 7 Ma in the west. Our estimated rises in the east and west parts of the NTP during 15 to 7 Ma, together with data from other TP regions, indicate that during the Late Miocene the entire plateau may have reached a high elevation close to that of today, with consequent impacts on atmospheric precipitation and alpine biodiversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available