4.1 Article

Evaluation of interference from 16 hemoglobin variants on hemoglobin A1c measurement by five methods

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2022.2155990

Keywords

HbA1c; hemoglobin variant; interference; method; China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hb variants prevalent in China differ from those in other countries and significantly interfere with the accuracy of commonly used HbA1c methods. A total of 16 species of Hb variants were identified in 102 variant carriers, with Hb E being the most common. Capillarys 3 OCTA, ADAMS HA-8180V, HLC-723 G8, and Cobas c501 showed clinically significant interference, leading to unacceptable HbA1c results in a considerable proportion of cases.
Hb variants prevalent in China are different from those in other countries. We aimed to assess the interference from Hb variants found in China on HbA1c measurement. All Hb variants were confirmed using Sanger sequencing. HbA1c was measured using a capillary electrophoresis method (Capillarys 3 OCTA), two cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography methods (ADAMS HA-8180V and HLC-723 G8 standard mode), an immunoassay (Cobas c501), and a boronate affinity chromatography method (Premier Hb9210). Premier Hb9210 was used as a comparative method. A total of 16 species of Hb variants were identified in 102 variant carriers. The most common variant was Hb E, followed by Hb Q-Thailand, Hb New York and Hb J-Bangkok. Clinically significant interference was observed for the Capillarys 3 OCTA (two Hb variants), ADAMS HA-8180V (seven Hb variants), HLC-723 G8 (14 Hb variants), and Cobas c501 (two Hb variants). The proportion of unacceptable HbA1c results was 13.7% for Capillarys 3 OCTA, 52.9% for HA-8180V, 83.3% for HLC-723 G8, and 3.9% for Cobas c501. Hb variants in China severely affect the accuracy of some commonly used HbA1c methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available