4.7 Article

Donations for environmental sustainability and subjective well-being: Evidence from 37 nations

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106609

Keywords

Environmental conservation; Pro -environmental behavior; Donation; Emotion; Multination

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund [JPMEERF20201001]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20H00648]
  3. Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation [J220000023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between donations for environment sustainability and emotional well-being. The results show that people engaged in donations and volunteering are more likely to experience positive emotions and less likely to experience negative emotions.
This study investigates donations for environment sustainability and emotional well-being using a large-scale survey of 100,956 observations from 37 nations on 6 continents based on the internet and face-to-face methods according to goal framing theory. The relationship between individuals' pro-environmental conservation behavior (donations and volunteerism) and positive and negative emotions was determined using an ordered logit model. We found that people engaged in donations (cash and goods) or volunteering had an increased likelihood of experiencing positive emotions and a reduced probability of experiencing negative emotions. Similarly, the results confirmed that 27 of 37 nations, including China, India, the United States and Japan. Donating for nature less than 9% of income was associated with a higher probability of positive emotional wellbeing and a lower likelihood of negative emotion. Worldwide institutions, such as the United Nations, have constructed new environmental conservation programs that may be an option for contributing to sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available