4.7 Article

Hybrid uncertainty quantification of dependent competing failure process with chance theory

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108958

Keywords

Dependent competing failure process (DCFP); Aleatory uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; Chance theory; Combinational algorithm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper analyzes and quantifies the hybrid uncertainty of DCFP system, and proposes a combinational algorithm to solve it. Taking the control system of an aircraft as a case, the reliability of the system is evaluated and the effects of key parameters on system reliability are discussed.
Dependent competing failure process (DCFP) has been widely studied in recent years. When evaluating the reliability of DCFP system, the aleatory uncertainty due to randomness and the epistemic uncertainty due to lack of data and knowledge should be considered. In this paper, the hybrid uncertainty of DCFP system is analyzed and quantified with chance theory. The uncertainty random renewal reward process and the arithmetic Liu process are used to describe the shock and degradation process. The quantification of uncertainty propagation is realized by decoupling DCFP from the physical correlation aspect. Reliability of DCFP system considering two kinds of unilateral dependencies and mutual dependency is modeled and a combinational algorithm is proposed to solve it. Finally, the DCFP effect in control system of an aircraft is studied as a case, aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty are modeled, and the system reliability is evaluated. Meanwhile, the effects of key pa-rameters on system reliability are discussed. Results show that the chance theory is an appropriate method to qualify the hybrid uncertainty for engineering systems when data is insufficient. The mutual dependency of soft failure and hard failure will reduce the system reliability. The smaller the parameter of hard failure, the greater the influence of mutual dependency on the results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available