4.7 Article

Radiotherapy-specific quality indicators at national level: How to make it happen

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.022

Keywords

Quality improvement; Quality indicators; Radiation oncology; Benchmarking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to promote best practice and quality of care, the Belgian College of Physicians for Radiotherapy Centers established a set of radiotherapy specific quality indicators for benchmarking on a national level. This paper describes the development, the collected QIs, the observed trends and the departments' evaluation of this initiative.
Purpose /objective: To promote best practice and quality of care, the Belgian College of Physicians for Radiotherapy Centers established a set of radiotherapy specific quality indicators for benchmarking on a national level. This paper describes the development, the collected QIs, the observed trends and the departments' evaluation of this initiative.Material and methods: The Donabedian approach was used, focussing on structural, process and outcome QIs. The criteria for QI selection were availability, required for low-threshold regular collection, and applicability to guidelines and good practice. The QIs were collected yearly and individualized reports were sent out to all RT departments. In 2021, a national survey was held to evaluate the ease of data col-lection and submission, and the perceived importance and validity of the collected QIs.Results: 18 structural QI and 37 process and outcome parameters (n = 25 patients/pathology/department) were collected. The participation rate amounted to 95 % overall. The analysis gave a national overview of RT activity, resources, clinical practice and reported acute toxicities. The individualized reports allowed departments to benchmark their performance.The 2021 survey indicated that the QIs were overall easy to collect, relevant and reliable. The collection of acute recorded toxicities was deemed a weak point due to inter-observer variabilities and lack of follow-up time.Conclusion: QI collection on a national level is a valuable process in steering quality improvement initia-tives. The feasibility and relevance was demonstrated with a high level of participation. The national ini-tiative will continue to evolve as a quality monitoring and improvement tool.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 178 (2023) 109433

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available