Journal
RADIOLOGY
Volume 306, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221926
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Deep learning analysis of chest radiographs may facilitate more efficient triage of patients with acute chest pain syndrome in the emergency department.
Background: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain (ACP) syndrome undergo additional testing to exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE), or aortic dissection (AD), often yielding negative results.Purpose: To assess whether deep learning (DL) analysis of the initial chest radiograph may help triage patients with ACP syndrome more efficiently.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study used electronic health records of patients with ACP syndrome at presentation who underwent a combination of chest radiography and additional cardiovascular or pulmonary imaging or stress tests at two hospitals (Massachusetts General Hospital [MGH], Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH]) between January 2005 and December 2015. A DL model was trained on 23 005 patients from MGH to predict a 30-day composite end point of ACS, PE, AD, and all-cause mortality based on chest radiographs. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare performance between models (model 1: age + sex; model 2: model 1 + conventional troponin or D-dimer positivity; model 3: model 2 + DL predictions) in internal and external test sets from MGH and BWH, respectively. Results: At MGH, 5750 patients (mean age, 59 years +/- 17 [SD]; 3329 men, 2421 women) were evaluated. Model 3, which included DL predictions, significantly improved discrimination of those with the composite outcome compared with models 2 and 1 (AUC, 0.85 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.86] vs 0.76 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.77] vs 0.62 [95% CI: 0.60 0.64], respectively; P < .001 for all). When using a sensitivity threshold of 99%, 14% (813 of 5750) of patients could be deferred from cardiovascular or pulmonary testing for differential diagnosis of ACP syndrome using model 3 compared with 2% (98 of 5750) of patients using model 2 (P < .001). Model 3 maintained its diagnostic performance in different age, sex, race, and ethnicity groups. In external validation at BWH (22 764 patients; mean age, 57 years +/- 17; 11 470 women), trends were similar and improved after fine tuning.Conclusion: Deep learning analysis of chest radiographs may facilitate more efficient triage of patients with acute chest pain syndrome in the emergency department.(c) RSNA, 2023Supplemental material is available for this article.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available