Journal
PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2023.102979
Keywords
Mixing; Diapycnal diffusion; Isopycnal diffusion; Water mass transformation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Shipboard measurements were used to estimate diffusivities in the Southern Ocean. Diapycnal diffusivities on neutral density surfaces were estimated to be (9.5 +/- 6.8) x 10-5, (10.7 +/- 2.6) x 10-5, and (13.8 +/- 3.7) x 10-5 m2s-1. Isopycnal diffusivities in different water masses were estimated to be -30 +/- 116, 16 +/- 319, and -30 +/- 83 m2s-1. Large uncertainties were caused by the box inverse model and the size of the box.
Shipboard measurements of temperature, salinity and horizontal current velocity were used to estimate diapycnal and isopycnal diffusivities in the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean between 120 degrees E and 150 degrees E near 64 degrees S, along the climatological positions of the Southern Antarctic Circumpolar Current Front and the Southern Boundary. The diapycnal diffusivities estimated by the finescale parameterization on the neutral density surfaces of 1028.05, 1028.2, and 1028.3 kg m-3 are (9.5 +/- 6.8) x 10-5, (10.7 +/- 2.6) x 10-5, and (13.8 +/- 3.7) x 10-5 m2s-1, respectively (mean +/- one standard deviation). At these densities, salinity and temperature decreased with depth but salt fingering was unlikely. Using the water mass transformation framework and a box inverse model, the isopycnal diffusivities were estimated from the diapycnal diffusivities. Climatological estimates of the isopycnal diffusivities in the density ranges of Upper Circumpolar Deep Water, Lower Circumpolar Deep Water, and Antarctic Bottom Water were -30 +/- 116, 16 +/- 319, and -30 +/- 83 m2s-1, respectively. These diffusivities were likely underestimates by 10 to 20 m2s-1 because eddy transport could not be considered in the climatological data. The weak isopycnal diffusivities were not inconsistent with diffusivity suppressed by the frontal jets. The large uncertainties were caused by the uncertainty in the box inverse model and the fact that the size of the box was comparable to the advection speed times the diffusion time scale.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available