4.7 Article

King- and queen-specific degradation of uric acid contributes to reproduction in termites

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1942

Keywords

eusocial insect; gene knockdown; nitrogen metabolism; purine catabolism; uricase; uricolysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Caste-based reproductive division of labour in social insects is based on asymmetries in resource allocation within colonies. Kings and queens consume limited resources for reproduction, while non-reproductive castes help reproductive castes. Studying the regulation of resource allocation is crucial for understanding insect sociality, although the molecular background is poorly understood.
Caste-based reproductive division of labour in social insects is built on asymmetries in resource allocation within colonies. Kings and queens dominantly consume limited resources for reproduction, while non-reproductive castes such as workers and soldiers help reproductive castes. Studying the regulation of such asymmetries in resource allocation is crucial for understanding the maintenance of sociality in insects, although the molecular background is poorly understood. We focused on uric acid, which is reserved and used as a valuable nitrogen source in wood-eating termites. We found that king- and queen-specific degradation of uric acid contributes to reproduction in the subterranean termite Reticulitermes speratus. The urate oxidase gene (RsUAOX), which catalyses the first step of nitrogen recycling from stored uric acid, was highly expressed in mature kings and queens, and upregulated with differentiation into neotenic kings/queens. Suppression of uric acid degradation decreased the number of eggs laid per queen. Uric acid was shown to be provided by workers to reproductive castes. Our results suggest that the capacity to use nitrogen, which is essential for the protein synthesis required for reproduction, maintains colony cohesion expressed as the reproductive monopoly held by kings and queens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available