4.8 Article

Intrinsically disordered interaction network in an RNA chaperone revealed by native mass spectrometry

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2208780119

Keywords

RNA chaperone; small RNA; intrinsically disordered protein; ion mobility mass spectrometry; surface-induced ion dissociation

Funding

  1. NIH [1P41GM128577-01, R35 GM136351-03]
  2. Johns Hopkins University Provost's Office (PURA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA-binding protein Hfq stabilizes its hexamer through a network of intrinsically disordered interactions between the core and flexible C-terminal domains (CTDs). This network is perturbed by RNA binding, but partially compensated by RNA interactions with multiple surfaces of Hfq.
RNA-binding proteins contain intrinsically disordered regions whose functions in RNA recognition are poorly understood. The RNA chaperone Hfq is a homohexamer that contains six flexible C-terminal domains (CTDs). The effect of the CTDs on Hfq's integrity and RNA binding has been challenging to study because of their sequence identity and inherent disorder. We used native mass spectrometry coupled with surfaceinduced dissociation and molecular dynamics simulations to disentangle the arrangement of the CTDs and their impact on the stability of Escherichia coli Hfq with and without RNA. The results show that the CTDs stabilize the Hfq hexamer through multiple interactions with the core and between CTDs. RNA binding perturbs this network of CTD interactions, destabilizing the Hfq ring. This destabilization is partially compensated by binding of RNAs that contact multiple surfaces of Hfq. By contrast, binding of short RNAs that only contact one or two subunits results in net destabilization of the complex. Together, the results show that a network of intrinsically disordered interactions integrate RNA contacts with the six subunits of Hfq. We propose that this CTD network raises the selectivity of RNA binding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available