4.4 Article

The effects of particle shape on inertial focusing

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544062231151542

Keywords

Inertial focusing; particle shape; immersed boundary; lattice Boltzmann method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a 2D particle inertial focusing model using the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method (IB-LBM) to investigate the impact of particle shapes on their focusing state. Circular particles were first studied as validation, obtaining consistent focus positions with previous reports. The focusing of circle, rectangle, ellipse, and capsule particles were then examined in detail, revealing significant influences of particle shapes on focusing positions, self-rotation, and running speed. This study provides valuable insights for screening or separating particles with different shapes in microfluidic devices.
This paper proposes a 2D particle inertial focusing model by the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method (IB-LBM), aiming to study the effects of particle shapes on their focusing state. First, as the validation, we investigated the inertial focusing of circular particles and got consistent focus positions with other previous reports. Then, the inertial focusing of the circle, rectangle, ellipse, and capsule particles were studied in detail. The results revealed that the particle shapes significantly influence the focusing positions, self-rotation, and running speed. At a given Reynolds number, the circular particle has a minimum average distance to the pipe center in the focus state, then follows the elliptical, capsular, and rectangular particles. The elliptical particle's self-rotation cycle is in approximately the cubed relation to the long-short axis ratio. Moreover, the rectangle particle runs fastest at the same Reynolds number, followed by capsule, ellipse, and circle particles. Our study and the above results can provide a significant reference for screening or separating particles with different shapes in microfluidic devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available