4.4 Review

Expanded carrier screening: What conditions should we screen for?

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 496-505

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.6306

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carrier screening is a test that evaluates the reproductive risk of couples by testing for affected genes. Recent evidence shows that offering carrier screening to all patients, regardless of ethnicity, effectively identifies at-risk couples and is supported by professional guidelines. Based on evaluation, we recommend a core panel of 64 conditions to improve the number of patients receiving comprehensive carrier screening.
Carrier screening tests reproductive couples for their risk of having children affected by serious monogenic conditions. Carrier screening has historically been offered for certain conditions in high-risk populations. However, more recent evidence has shown that offering carrier screening to all patients, regardless of their ethnicity, more effectively and equitably identifies at-risk couples. Coupled with technology that enables screening for a nearly unlimited number of conditions, this expanded carrier screening (ECS) approach is now supported by professional society guidelines. Despite recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics to screen all patients who are pregnant or considering pregnancy for 113 conditions, questions remain about what conditions should be included on a core ECS panel. Here, we briefly review the history of carrier screening and guidelines on criteria for panel design. We then suggest which of these criteria are most critical, as well as thresholds to identify which conditions meet these criteria. Based on these interpretations, we recommend a core panel of 64 conditions that would identify the vast majority of at-risk couples. Widespread adoption of a core panel such as this would result in a marked improvement in the number of patients currently receiving comprehensive carrier screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available