4.7 Article

Features of near gravitational material tracers in a dense medium cyclone from PEPT

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 415, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.118095

Keywords

Dense medium cyclone; Near-gravity material; PEPT; Flow field; Turbulence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on tracking near-gravity material radioactive tracers using positron emission particle tracking technology in order to study the separation performance of dense media cyclones. The study finds that the near-gravity phase of coal causes separation inefficiencies, which makes coal processing difficult.
Dense media cyclones are an integral part of circuits employed for coal processing, iron ore beneficiation, and recovery of diamonds. Many techniques have been applied in studying the separation performance of these devices including the use of different density tracers to develop density partition curves. This study focusses on tracking of near-gravity material radioactive tracers using the positron emission particle tracking technology. This near-gravity phase of coal has long been thought to cause separation inefficiencies which makes coal processing difficult. In this work, a slurry containing magnetite-based dense medium, and coal is pumped through a 100 mm Multotec cyclone. By means of the PEPT camera - apparatus with spatial and temporal resolutions of 1 mm and 1 ms respectively - and direct-adsorption-activated coal tracer particles within the medium, particle trajectories are recorded in space and time. The free vortex region is captured and shown to fit the Rankine vortex behaviour with n = 0.60 & PLUSMN; 0.08 overall for the free vortex power law decay. A logarithmic axial velocity model which captures the observed radial gradient around the locus of zero axial velocity is proposed. Radial profiles of turbulence intensity for the near gravitational material as captured by PEPT are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available