4.7 Article

Parameter calibration and mixing uniformity of irregular gravel materials in a rotating drum

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 414, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.118074

Keywords

Gravel; DEM; RSM; Mixing uniformity; Rotating drum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the appropriate selection of physical and contact parameters in the mixing processes of gravel materials using the discrete element method was investigated. Physical parameters of irregular gravel were obtained through experiments, and contact parameters were determined using the response surface method. The mixing processes of gravel materials in a rotating drum with different cylindrical rod structures were simulated, and the number of contacts between particles was used to characterize the mixing uniformity. The results showed that cylindrical rods significantly improved mixing uniformity, with the best effect observed when the distance between cylindrical rods was twice the maximum particle size.
In the study of the mixing processes of gravel materials by using the discrete element method, an appropriate selection of physical and contact parameters is crucial. In this study, the physical parameters of irregular gravel were obtained by performing a series of experiments, and the contact parameters were determined using the response surface method. In addition, the V-box experiment was designed to verify the rationality of the pa-rameters. Furthermore, the mixing processes of gravel materials in a rotating drum with different cylindrical rod structures at the same rotational speed and filling degree were simulated, and the number of contacts between particles was used to quantitatively characterize the mixing uniformity. The simulation results revealed that cylindrical rods greatly improve the mixing uniformity; the effect is the best when the cylindrical rod distance is twice the maximum particle size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available