4.6 Article

High-Potential Porphyrins Supported on SnO2 and TiO2 Surfaces for Photoelectrochemical Applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 120, Issue 51, Pages 28971-28982

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10350

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science [DE-FG02-07ER15909]
  2. Argonne-Northwestern Solar Energy Research (ANSER) Center
  3. Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (US DOE-OS-BES) [DE-SC0001059]
  4. Center for High Performance Computing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  5. Yale Center for Research Computing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report CF3-substituted porphyrins and evaluate their use as photosensitizers in water-splitting dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical cells (WS-DSPECs) by characterizing interfacial electron transfer on metal oxide surfaces. By using (CF3)(2)C6H3 instead of C6F5 substituents at the meso positions, we obtain the desired high potentials while avoiding the sensitivity of C6F5 substituents to nucleophilic substitution, a process that limits the types of synthetic reactions that can be used. Both the number of CF3 groups and the central metal tune the ground and excited-state potentials. A pair of porphyrins bearing carboxylic acids as anchoring groups were deposited on SnO2 and TiO2 surfaces, and the interfacial charge-injection and charge-recombination kinetics were characterized by using a combination of computational modeling, terahertz measurements, and transient absorption spectroscopy. We find that both free-base and metalated porphyrins inject into SnO2 and that recombination is slower for the latter case. These findings demonstrate that (CF3)(2)C6H3-substituted porphyrins are promising photosensitizers for use in WS-DSPECs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available