4.7 Article

Effect of cross-linking agents on the adsorption of histamine on molecularly imprinted polyacrylamide

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.125724

Keywords

Molecularly imprinted polyacrylamide; Histamine; Cross -linking agent effects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the ability of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) with flexible cross-linking agents to selectively uptake guest molecules. New polyacrylamide polymers were synthesized for histamine (HA) extraction using MIPs immobilized on silica surface (SiO2). The prepared MIPs showed a strong absorption capacity for HA, with MIP4 made with the BA(4) cross-linker demonstrating higher selectivity compared to other MIPs. The Langmuir-Volmer and Volmer models accurately fit the adsorption isotherms and provide thermodynamic parameters. The higher performance of MIP4 is attributed to a higher density of molecular imprints and moderate flexibility of the material.
The ability of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) prepared with flexible cross-linking agents for selective uptake of guest molecules is investigated. New polyacrylamide polymers had been synthesized for histamine (HA) extraction using solid supports based on MIPs immobilized on silica surface (SiO2). The MIPs were prepared via radical polymerization in acetonitrile and in the presence of azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as initiator, using HA as a target molecule, acrylamide as a functional monomer and several cross-linking agents having alkyl spacers of various lengths: N,N '-methylenebisacrylamide (BA(1)), N,N '-ethylenebisacrylamide (BA(2)), N,N'-(butane-1,4-diyl)-bis(2-methacrylamide) (BA(4)) and N,N'-(hexane-1,6-diyl)-bis(2-methacrylamide) (BA(6)). All the pre-pared MIPs have a strong absorption capacity of HA compared to non-imprinted polyacrylamide (NIPs). MIP4 made with the BA(4) cross-linker shows a higher selectivity for adsorption of HA than MIPs made with BA(1), BA(2) and BA(6). Thus, the imprinting factor for adsorption from a 5 ppm HA solution was 2.5 for MIP4 against 1.4 to 1.6 for MIP1, MIP2 and MIP6. Langmuir-Volmer and Volmer models of the adsorption isotherms of MIPs and NIPs accurately fit the experimental data. They provide the characteristic parameters of the adsorption thermody-namic of the materials. The higher performance of MIP4 for selective adsorption of HA is mainly coming from a higher density of molecular imprints (1.4 mu mol m(-2) against 0.13-0.15 mu mol m(-2) for MIP1 and MIP2 and 0.4 mu mol m(-2) for MIP6) than a higher affinity of HA for the molecular imprints. The selectivity with respect to the tyramine and melamine interfering molecules is also higher for MIP4. As the main outcome, some moderate flexibility of the material is advantageous. Such flexibility allows for a reversible healing and re-opening of the molecular imprints as the HA guest is removed and back-adsorbed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available