4.3 Article

Response Surface Optimization of Vat Blue 4 Degradation Process Using Pseudomonas aeruginosa WYT

Journal

POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 865-878

Publisher

HARD
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/156123

Keywords

anthraquinone dyes; Vat Blue 4; biodegradation; response surface methodology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vat Blue 4, an anthraquinone dye, has been widely used in printing and dyeing industry for its bright color and low price. However, due to low utilization rate and improper handling, a large amount of dyes are discharged into the environment through wastewater. This study isolated a new strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa WYT which could degrade Vat Blue 4, but the degradation rate was low and unstable. To overcome this limitation, single factor and response surface experiments were conducted to optimize the culture conditions. Under the optimized conditions, the maximum degradation rate of Vat Blue 4 by Pseudomonas aeruginosa WYT increased from 85% to 97%.
Vat Blue 4, one of the anthraquinone dyes, were widely used in printing and dyeing industry due to bright color and low price. However, low utilization rate and improper handling lead a large number of dyes discharged into environment with wastewater. But few research report the Vat Blue 4 degradation by bacteria, perhaps too complex structure to biodegraded. In this work, we isolate a new strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa WYT which could degrade Vat Blue 4, and the degradation rate is low and unstable. To overcome this shortcoming, single factor and response surface experiments were designed to optimize its culture conditions. The optimal conditions of Pseudomonas aeruginosa WYT degradation of VB4 were obtained through this: temperature 35.0C, initial biomass 0.06, pH 7.0, glucose 1.0 g/L, urea 1.0 g/L, VB4 50 mg/L and 2 mL/L trace salt. Under these optimized conditions, the maximum degradation rate increased from initial 85% to 97%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available