4.6 Article

Quaternion to Euler angles conversion: A direct, general and computationally efficient method

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276302

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Aix Marseille university
  2. CNRS
  3. National agency for research (ANR OrigaBot project) [ANR-18-CE330008-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a general formula for converting a rotation quaternion to Euler angles, which works with all possible sequences of rotations. It also provides a comparison with a popular matrix-to-Euler angle algorithm and demonstrates a faster execution speed of 30 times. The algorithm's conciseness and straightforward implementation make it highly appealing.
Current methods of the conversion between a rotation quaternion and Euler angles are either a complicated set of multiple sequence-specific implementations, or a complicated method relying on multiple matrix multiplications. In this paper a general formula is presented for extracting the Euler angles in any desired sequence from a unit quaternion. This is a direct method, in that no intermediate conversion step is required (no quaternion-to-rotation matrix conversion, for example) and it is general because it works with all 12 possible sequences of rotations. A closed formula was first developed for extracting angles in any of the 12 possible sequences, both Proper Euler angles and Tait-Bryan angles. The resulting algorithm was compared with a popular implementation of the matrix-to-Euler angle algorithm, which involves a quaternion-to-matrix conversion in the first computational step. Lastly, a single-page pseudo-code implementation of this algorithm is presented, illustrating its conciseness and straightforward implementation. With an execution speed 30 times faster than the classical method, our algorithm can be of great interest in every aspect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available