4.6 Article

Cognitive reflection test: The effects of the items sequence on scores and response time

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279982

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to expand the research on the determinants of Cognitive Reflection Test scores and explores the effects of items sequence on (1) Cognitive Reflection Test scores, (2) response time, (3) the relationship between scores and response time, and (4) the effects on men and women. The study also examines the sex differences in test scores and response time based on items sequence. Results showed that manipulating the items sequence significantly improved Cognitive Reflection Test scores, but did not significantly affect response time. A positive relationship between scores and response time was found, except when scores were maximized. Differences between men and women in the results were also observed.
This paper aims to expand the literature on the determinants of the Cognitive Reflection Test scores, exploring the effects that the items sequence has on (1) Cognitive Reflection Test scores, (2) response time, (3) the relationship between Cognitive Reflection Test scores and response time, and (4) Cognitive Reflection scores, response time, and the relationship between both variables on men and women. The current study also explored the sex differences on Cognitive Reflection Test and response time according to items sequence. The results showed that manipulating the items sequence, the performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test improved significantly, but the response time were not significantly affected, although the results suggest that first items of the sequence could be working as training items. A positive relationship between Cognitive Reflection Test scores and response time was also found, except when the scores were maximized. Finally, some differences between men and women on the results were also found. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available