Impact of surface coating and systemic anticoagulants on hemostasis and inflammation in a human whole blood model

BackgroundSurface compatibility with blood is critical both for scientific investigations on hemostasis and clinical applications. Regarding in vitro and ex vivo investigations, minimal alteration in physiological hemostasis is of particular importance to draw reliable conclusions on the human coagulation system. At the same time, artificial coagulation activation must be avoided, which is relevant for the patient, for example to prevent stent graft occlusion. The aim was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of antithrombotic and antifouling surface coatings in the context of their suitability for ex vivo incubation and the study of coagulation properties. MethodsWe investigated the impact of different protocols for surface coating of synthetic material and different anticoagulants on hemostasis and platelet activation in ex vivo human whole blood.Blood samples from healthy donors were incubated in coated microtubes on a rotating wheel at 37 degrees C. Two protocols for surface coating were analyzed for hemostatic parameters and metabolic status, a heparin-based coating (CHC, Corline Heparin Conjugate) without further anticoagulation and a passivating coating (MPC, 2-methacryloyloxethyl phosphorylcholine) with added anticoagulants (enoxaparin, ENOX; or fondaparinux, FPX). Employing the MPC-based coating, the anticoagulants enoxaparin and fondaparinux were compared regarding their differential effects on plasmatic coagulation by thrombelastometry and on platelet activation by flowcytometry and platelet function assays. ResultsUsing the CHC coating, significant coagulation cascade activation was observed, whereas parameters remained mostly unchanged with MPC-based protocols. Extended incubation caused significantly elevated levels of the soluble membrane attack complex. Neither ENOX nor FPX caused a relevant impairment of platelet function or activation capacity and thrombelastometric parameters remained unchanged with both protocols. For translational purposes, we additionally modeled endotoxemia with the MPC-based protocols by incubating with lipopolysaccharide plus/minus thrombin. While coagulation parameters remained unchanged, elevated Interleukin 8 and Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 demonstrated preserved immune cell responsiveness. ConclusionsThe MPC-based protocols demonstrated better hemocompatibility compared to CHC, and ENOX and FPX proved useful for additional anticoagulation. Furthermore, this simple-to-use whole blood model may be useful for experimental analyses of the early coagulatory and immunological response without decalcification.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of antithrombotic and antifouling surface coatings for ex vivo incubation and the study of coagulation properties. The MPC-based coatings demonstrated better hemocompatibility compared to the CHC-based coatings, and ENOX and FPX proved useful for additional anticoagulation. This simple-to-use whole blood model may be useful for experimental analyses of the early coagulatory and immunological response.