4.6 Article

Epidemiology of foodborne bongkrekic acid poisoning outbreaks in China, 2010 to 2020

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279957

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

From 2010-2020, there were 19 outbreaks of fatal bongkrekic acid (BA) poisoning in China, resulting in 146 illnesses, 139 hospitalizations, and 43 deaths with a case-fatality rate of 29.5%. The majority of outbreaks (73.3%) occurred in South and Southwest China. Homemade fermented corn flour products, tremella, and sweet potato flour and corn flour products (jelly) were the main causes of early outbreaks, while novel vehicles like wet rice noodles and Auricularia auricula were associated with later outbreaks. Most outbreaks occurred at home (79.0%) or in restaurants (21.0%). Prohibiting traditional processed homemade fermented corn flour products and improving case identification and early treatment have led to a reduction in the case-fatality rate.
Foodborne bongkrekic acid (BA) poisoning is a fatal foodborne disease in China. From 2010-2020, a total of 19 BA poisoning outbreaks were reported to the China National Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System. These outbreaks involved 146 illnesses, 139 hospitalizations, and 43 deaths, with a case-fatality rate of 29.5%. Approximately 73.3% of the outbreaks occurred in South and Southwest China. Homemade fermented corn flour products, tremella, and sweet potato flour and corn flour products (jelly) caused more early outbreaks, and novel vehicles (wet rice noodles and Auricularia auricula) were associated with later outbreaks in the study period. Outbreaks most frequently occurred at home (79.0%) and in restaurants (21.0%). The prohibition of traditional processed homemade fermented corn flour products and improvement in bongkrekic acid poisoning case identification and early treatment have resulted in a reduction in the case-fatality rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available