4.6 Article

High Energy Density Performance of Polymer Nanocomposites Induced by Designed Formation of BaTiO3@sheet-IikeTiO2 Hybrid Nanofillers

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 120, Issue 22, Pages 11769-11776

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01853

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China through a 973-Project [2012CB619401]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [11204233, 51431007, 51321003]
  3. Ministry of Education [IRT13034]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocomposites incorporating inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) within ferroelectric polymeric matrices have great potential for high density energy capacitors, In this strategy, employing the nanostructures with specially designed morphology as fillers would notably improve the energy storage. However, this strategy is extremely challenging and has not been largely explored. Here, the BaTiO3@sheet-likeTiO(2) core shell NPs have been successfully synthesized, and can be well-dispersed into polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) matrices. The nanocomposites with the volume fraction 2.5% BT@TiO2 NPs have higher the electric displacement (6.0 mu m/cm(2)) than that of PVDF films with the 2.5 vol % BaTiO3 (BT) NPs (5.1 mu m/cm(2)) under the same electric field of 350 kV/mm, which is mainly ascribed to the hierarchical interfacical polarization induced by the large surface area of TiO2 sheet assembled on BT NPs in the nanocomposites. Simultaneously, the medium permittivity TiO2 with medium er as a buffer layer between the BT NPs and polymer matrix could minimize the inhomogeneous electric field in the nanocomposites, which results in the enhancement of the breakdown strength (490-kV/mm with 2.5 vol % BT@TiO2 NPs) compared to pristine PVDF. As a result of a gratifying E-B and D; the energy density of the nanocomposites with 2.5 vol % BT@TiO2 NPs reached 17.6 J/cc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available