4.7 Article

Evaluating water use advantage of wheat/maize relay intercropping under rainfed condition based on same period

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-022-05772-z

Keywords

Water use; Non-growth period; Intercropping; Fallow

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32101849, 31817560, 41571506]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0403600, 2017YFC0403605]
  3. Key Science & Technology Innovation Team Program of Shaanxi Province [2017KCT-15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed water consumption in wheat/maize relay intercropping systems and sole crop systems, and found that the revised method can better evaluate the water use advantage of relay intercropping systems. The results showed that intercropping systems can increase both yield and water use efficiency, particularly in areas with limited water resources.
Aim Assessing water consumption in intercropping systems relative to sole crop systems is important for planting system planning. Methods This study focused on wheat/maize (Triticum aestivum L./Zea mays L.) relay intercropping to evaluate water use advantage of relay intercropping system based on the same period. Field experiments were conducted from 2014 to 2016, and three cropping patterns were designed: sole wheat, sole maize, wheat/maize intercrops. Method for evaluating water use advantage in intercropping was revised by considering water consumption of sole crops during the fallow period (periods where no plants are grown). Results Intercropping grain yield was higher than sole cropping yield. Based on the existing method, the intercropping system had 20.4% greater water use than the sole cropping system and the water equivalent ratio (WER) was lower than 1; after revision, intercropping had 7.7% less water use than sole cropping, and the WER was greater than 1. Before revision, intercropped wheat used 3.1% more water than sole wheat, and the intercropped maize used 38.8% more water than sole maize; after revision, intercropped wheat used 24.4% less water than sole wheat, and intercropped maize used 11.0% more water than sole maize. Conclusion These results indicated that the revised method can be better used to evaluate water use advantage of relay intercropping system. This study implied that wheat/maize intercropping increased both yield and water use based on revised method, and relay intercropping can be a suitable production practice employed in fallow policy, especially in areas with limited water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available