4.8 Article

Nearly Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Estimating Multiple Expectation Values

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 129, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.240501

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Co -Design Center for Quantum Advantage [DE-SC0012704]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. NSF [PHY-1748958]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This Letter addresses the task of estimating the expectation values of multiple observables in quantum algorithms. The authors propose an approach that utilizes a quantum gradient estimation algorithm to achieve efficient estimation. They demonstrate that this approach provides optimal scaling in the high-precision regime and showcases its flexibility.
Many quantum algorithms involve the evaluation of expectation values. Optimal strategies for estimating a single expectation value are known, requiring a number of state preparations that scales with the target error e as O(1=e thorn . In this Letter, we address the task of estimating the expectation values of M different observables, each to within additive error e, with the same 1=e dependence. We describe an approach that leverages Gilyen et al.'s quantum gradient estimation algorithm to achieve O( p =e thorn scaling up to ffiffiffiffiM logarithmic factors, regardless of the commutation properties of the M observables. We prove that this scaling is worst-case optimal in the high-precision regime if the state preparation is treated as a black box, even when the operators are mutually commuting. We highlight the flexibility of our approach by presenting several generalizations, including a strategy for accelerating the estimation of a collection of dynamic correlation functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available