4.8 Article

Dark Solar Wind

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 129, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.211101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY-1914731, PHY-2014215]
  2. Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics
  3. JHU Joint Postdoc Fund
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-1818899]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Superconducting Quantum Materials and Systems Center (SQMS) [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  6. DOE [DE-SC0012012]
  7. Simons Investigator Award [827042, 824870]
  8. DOE HEP QuantISED Award [100495]
  9. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant [GBMF7946]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the emission of self-thermalizing light dark sector particles in the solar system. We found that this phenomenon is commonly observed in a dark sector composed of millicharged particles interacting via a dark photon, resulting in a plasma wind with distinctive and predictable signatures.
We study the solar emission of light dark sector particles that self-interact strongly enough to self-thermalize. The resulting outflow behaves like a fluid which accelerates under its own thermal pressure to highly relativistic bulk velocities in the solar system. Compared to the ordinary noninteracting scenario, the local outflow has at least-103 higher number density and correspondingly at least-103 lower average energy per particle. We show how this generic phenomenon arises in a dark sector composed of millicharged particles strongly self-interacting via a dark photon. The millicharged plasma wind emerging in this model has novel yet predictive signatures that encourages new experimental directions. This phenomenon demonstrates how a small step away from the simplest models can lead to radically different outcomes and thus motivates a broader search for dark sector particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available