4.8 Article

Irreducible Magic Sets for n-Qubit Systems

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 129, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.200401

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magic sets of observables are fundamental tools for investigating the interface between classical and quantum physics. This study answers two open questions regarding magic sets and provides an efficient algorithm for determining if a hypergraph can accommodate a magic set.
Magic sets of observables are minimal structures that capture quantum state-independent advantage for systems of n >= 2 qubits and are, therefore, fundamental tools for investigating the interface between classical and quantum physics. A theorem by Arkhipov (arXiv:1209.3819) states that n-qubit magic sets in which each observable is in exactly two subsets of compatible observables can be reduced either to the twoqubit magic square or the three-qubit magic pentagram [N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990)]. An open question is whether there are magic sets that cannot be reduced to the square or the pentagram. If they exist, a second key question is whether they require n > 3 qubits, since, if this is the case, these magic sets would capture minimal state-independent quantum advantage that is specific for n-qubit systems with specific values of n. Here, we answer both questions affirmatively. We identify magic sets that cannot be reduced to the square or the pentagram and require n = 3, 4, 5, or 6 qubits. In addition, we prove a generalized version of Arkhipov's theorem providing an efficient algorithm for, given a hypergraph, deciding whether or not it can accommodate a magic set, and solve another open problem, namely, given a magic set, obtaining the tight bound of its associated noncontextuality inequality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available